Sorry, this entry is only available in European Spanish.
Recently, we had the pleasure to welcome Iliana Olivié to our university and explain it to us. She is a researcher for the Elcano Royal Institute as well as a teacher in the Department of International Economy and Development of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
The Global Presence Index was created by the Elcano Royal institute and it is a tool to understand the international trends along with tracking the external policy of different countries. The idea emerged due to the lack of an index explaining what was going on after the two block’s world, who were the stakeholders and the shifting role of the existent ones. Since 2010, 100 countries have been represented on a yearly basis, as well as certain previous years that had been relevant in the international panorama. In total, 6 regions are represented, yet not all of them equally. As a consequence, 2 more regions will be added soon: sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean. The criteria to choose which countries will form part of the index gathered the first 83 economies of the world, European Union Member States and OECD members. In order to carry out the project, 3 dimensions were taken into consideration: economy, military and soft power.
At the same time, these 3 categories were divided into 16 variables such as education, energy, manufactures, troops, information and culture; It is important to note that gender inequality was not among the variables included. Despite the fact that it had to be weighed up, it was considered a domestic factor that could easily alter the other variables. Therefore, this indicator shows the presence of each country on the international arena and the changes that they suffer. As years pass by, the presence of every country increases but some go faster than others. For example, old powers are decaying and emerging countries are still rising, except China who is ranked second.
Concerning the European region, it must be highlighted that the United Kingdom is the main contributor to European global projection in spite of not being very interested on fostering intra European relations
Author: Ane and Itsaso, International Relations students
Emmanuel Macron, a 39 year-old former investment banker, won France’s presidential election on Sunday, defeating Marine Le Pen after voters repudiated her far-right message. Macron achieved the 66% of the total votes, compared with 34% for Le Pen, according to the Interior Ministry’s official count.
Macron will be the youngest president in the 59-year history of France’s Fifth Republic after leading a difficult campaign aimed at promoting the loosening of labour rules, the creation of a global and competitive market for France globally and the intensification of ties with the European Union.
However, the results show that a great part of the French population was skeptic about both projects, since nearly 34% of voters did not cast a ballot or cast a blank one. Indeed, the abstention rate was the highest since the year 1969.
This lack of support forecasts a laborious path for the following five years and Macron now tries to build a legislative majority. He has no party in the Parliament and French parliamentary elections will be held next month.
The president of the United States and the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, have restarted direct communications with the aim of agreeing a new ceasefire in the civil way of Syria. Tuesday’s call was intended to advance in a more collaborative relationship after the rupture of interactions over the past weeks.
Donald Trump has consented to assign a representative to the ceasefire talks which start on Wednesday in Kazakhstan, in the first conversation between the US and Russia since the first launched a missile strike on Syria as a retaliation for a chemical attack on civilians.
At Kazakhstan, Putin intends to suggest that Russia, Iran and Turkey act as buffer forces in order to separate the government and rebel forces in diverse areas of Syria. However, US and Russian officials show opposite approaches regarding the establishment of safe zones over the country to protect civilians.
Last Monday, Hamas, the Palestinian Sunni-Islamic armed group, presented a moderate public face towards the state of Israel with the aim of gaining international recognition and getting closer to Palestinian leadership.
The statement, presented some days before the Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas is meeting Donald Trump, urges to develop closer relations with Egypt, avoids any possible anti-Semitic language and accepts a provisional Palestinian state — according to the borders established in 1967. This, however, does not mean that Hamas formally recognizes the state of Israel.
The group is still considered a terrorist group by almost every western country and this status has led to the exclusion of Hamas from international negotiations over the future of Palestine. Therefore, the armed group is trying to project a more friendly approach toward the Palestinian cause.
This step could definitely be considered as a point of inflexion in order to gain more credibility both in Palestine and in the international community. Nevertheless, Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel has denounced the move and affirmed the statement “is a smoke screen”.
The British government has made public its intention to formally notify the European Union of its purpose to leave the community on March 29. Next Wednesday the United Kingdom and the European Union will start a two-year negotiation exit, under the authority of Article 50 of the European Union’s Treaty.
According to the Article 50, any member state may conclude to leave the European Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements. The United Kingdom is expected to withdraw from the European Union by early 2019.
Theresa May’s government hopes that the other 27 EU members will then meet to acknowledge their guidelines for the negotiations and the European Commission’s negotiating rules. The Brexit secretary, David Davis, considers Brexit process as “the most important negotiation for this country in a generation”.
The European Union’s highest court ruled last Tuesday that private companies are authorized to prohibit female employees from wearing headscarves at job. It stated that banning “the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign” cannot be found as direct discrimination.
The ruling of the European Court of Justice dictated that enterprises were legitimized to forbid these symbols so as to project a neutral image to the public. However, customers will not be authorized to request female workers to remove headscarves if the company has no regulations disallowing religious symbols.
Countries such as France, Belgium, Austria and the Netherlands have already passed laws to ban full face-covering veils in public and government spaces or are considering doing so. Precisely, the ruling on this politically explosive issue appears when the European Union faces a critical election season, with races in the Netherlands, France and Germany.
With anti-immigrant and anti-Islam populism increasing in many European countries, the ruling of the European Court of Justice will be binding for the 28 member states of the Union.
Turkey’s relationship with Europe has weakened during the weekend after Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkish president, blamed the Dutch government of being Nazi and Turkish politicians were banned from a political event in the Netherlands.
While this month German officials have been criticized for forbidding Turkish campaigns to vote yes to the referendum which would expand Erdogan’s powers, the Dutch government impeded the landing of the Turkish foreign minister and escorted the Turkish family minister out of the country.
The government of Netherlands, which has generally considered an open approach to face different attitudes, is in the middle of an assertive election campaign that has immigration as the primary issue.
Elsewhere in Europe, countries such as Denmark, Sweden, France, Switzerland or Austria have backed the decision taken by the Dutch government and made it clear that Erdogan’s campaign is unwelcome there.
The International Women’s Day 2017 placed women’s work in the first line by arranging strikes in more than 50 countries throughout the world. This first International Women’s Strike from both paid and unpaid labor aimed to put more pressure on governments, institutions and corporations by giving women a voice that has been ignored until now.
On one of the most political International Women’s Day, millions of people took part in worldwide actions to show solidarity with a revived and powerful global women’s movement.
Organizers arranged the International Women’s Strike by joining the coordinators of the Women’s March and other hundreds of human and women’s rights’ activists around the globe. The theme for the year 2017, which was #BeBoldForChange, praised the economic, political, social and cultural achievements of women throughout history.
Moreover, organizers from diverse countries proposed supporters to wear diverse colors such as red in solidarity with the women’s labor movement, black to focus on issues like femicide or abortion, and other colors depending on the topics that were claimed.